CAQDAS, and Artificial Intelligence: New Challenges and Possibilities for Teaching Qualitative Data Coding

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20453/spirat.v3iNE1.5579

Keywords:

CAQDAS, artificial intelligence, coding, grounded theory

Abstract

The research evaluates the value and power of an AI tool such as Chat GPT as CAQDAS (Computer-Aided Qualitative Data Analysis Software) An experiment carried out using version 4.0 of the application is presented, using it as a standalone tool, even though traditional CAQDAS programs, such as ATLAS ti already announce a collaboration interface with Chat GPT. The focus is on the function of Open Coding, as one of the initial stages of the processing of qualitative material (and one of the most tiring) according to the original proposal of the Grounded Theory (GT) and which was adopted, due to their usefulness, for various other less canonical forms of qualitative analysis. An experiment is conducted with a sample of qualitative material associated with news related to migration issues. From this, through an inductive exercise facilitated by AI, a set of codes is obtained to give way to more complex instances of the analytical process (Axial Coding, Theoretical Elaboration, etc.). The existing potential in the use of the computational tool is revealed, in terms of power for a first (proposal) of Open Coding with optimization of human resources and time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nelson Paulus Santibáñez, Universidad de Santiago de Chile. Santiago, Chile.

Licenciado en Sociología por la Universidad Católica de Chile, magíster en Antropología y Desarrollo por la Universidad de Chile, máster de Iniciación a la Investigación en Política Social y doctor en Sociología por Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.

Byron Duhalde Valenzuela, Universidad de Santiago de Chile. Santiago, Chile.

Licenciado en Estudios Internacionales y magíster en Estudios Internacionales por la Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH). Investigador del Centro de Estudios Migratorios de la Facultad de Humanidades de la USACH.

References

Andreu, J., García, A., & Pérez, A. (2007). Evolución de la teoría fundamentada como técnica de análisis cualitativo. Madrid. Centro de investigaciones sociológicas. Cuadernos Metodológicos, 40.

Bryant, A. (2023, June). AI Chatbots: Threat or Opportunity? In Informatics (Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 49). MDPI.

Carrero, V., Soriano, R. M., & Trinidad, A. (2012). Teoría fundamentada Grounded Theory (Vol. 37). CIS.

Goyanes, M., Lopezosa, C., & Jordá, B. (2024). Thematic Analysis of Interview Data with ChatGPT: Designing and Testing a Reliable Research Protocol for Qualitative Research.

Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2023). ChatGPT y software CAQDAS para el análisis cualitativo de entrevistas: pasos para combinar la inteligencia artificial de OpenAI con ATLAS. ti, Nvivo y MAXQDA.

Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., & Boté-Vericad, J. J. (2023). Testeando ATLAS. ti con OpenAI: hacia un nuevo paradigma para el análisis cualitativo de entrevistas con inteligencia artificial.

Lopezosa, C., Codina, L., Pont-Sorribes, C., & Vállez, M. (2023). Use of generative artificial intelligence in the training of journalists: challenges, uses and training proposal. Profesional de la información/Information Professional, 32(4).

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd.

Nguyen-Trung, K. (2024). ChatGPT in Thematic Analysis: Can AI become a research assistant in qualitative research? OSF Preprint.

Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Ways of Harnessing Pedagogical Practices with the Assistance of ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), 103-111.

Rodríguez Gómez, G., Gil Flores, J., & García Jiménez, E. (1999). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Segunda edición. Aljibe

Safaei, M., & Longo, J. (2024). The End of the Policy Analyst? Testing the Capability of Artificial Intelligence to Generate Plausible, Persuasive, and Useful Policy Analysis. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(1), 1-35.

Sebastian, K. (2019). Distinguishing between the strains grounded theory: Classical, interpretive and constructivist. Journal for Social Thought, 3(1).

Published

2025-07-22

How to Cite

Paulus Santibáñez, N., & Duhalde Valenzuela, B. (2025). CAQDAS, and Artificial Intelligence: New Challenges and Possibilities for Teaching Qualitative Data Coding. Spirat. Revista Académica De Docencia Y Gestión Universitaria, 3(NE1), e5579. https://doi.org/10.20453/spirat.v3iNE1.5579