Role of Key Actors in Blood Culture: From the Physician to the Microbiology Laboratory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v37i1.6431Keywords:
blood culture, indicators for healthcare quality attention, sepsisAbstract
Blood culture is an essential tool for diagnosing bloodstream infections. In this article, aspects of the blood culture process are evaluated with emphasis on the critical roles of the physician (indications), the phlebotomist -which in hospitals may be performed by different groups including technicians, doctors, or nurses- (aseptic technique), and the laboratory staff (quality indicators, such as volume and contamination rates) in optimizing diagnostic results. Additionally, the role of the microbiology laboratory in assessing and monitoring blood culture quality indicators, such as blood volume per bottle, positivity rate, and contaminant rate, is reviewed to optimize the use of this diagnostic tool.
Downloads
References
Yagui M, Silva J, Mayta M, et al. Mapa microbiológico hospitalario: herramienta para monitorear la resistencia a los antimicrobianos. 2022 [citado 05 de diciembre de 2024]; 126-126. Disponible en: https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/5509467/4908652-mapa-microbiologico.pdf?v=1701458784
Sulis G, Sayood S, Gandra S. Antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: current status and future directions. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2022;20(2):147-60. doi:10.1080/14787210.2021.1951705
Gales AC, Castanheira M, Jones RN, Sader HS. Antimicrobial resistance among Gram-negative bacilli isolated from Latin America: results from SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (Latin America, 2008-2010). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73(4):354-60. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.04.007
World Health Organization. Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) Report [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 4 de diciembre de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240027336
Fabre V, Sharara SL, Salinas AB, et al. Does this patient need blood cultures? A scoping review of indications for blood cultures in adult nonneutropenic inpatients. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(5):1339-47. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa039
Antillon M, Saad NJ, Baker S, et al. The relationship between blood sample volume and diagnostic sensitivity of blood culture for typhoid and paratyphoid fever: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect Dis. 2018;218:S255-67. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy471
Krapp F, Rondon C, Amaro C, et al. Underutilization and quality gaps in blood culture processing in public hospitals of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;106(2):432-40. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0770
Cheng MP, Stenstrom R, Paquette K, et al. Blood culture results before and after antimicrobial administration in patients with severe manifestations of sepsis: a diagnostic study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(8):547-54. doi:10.7326/M19-1696
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principles and procedures for blood cultures. CLSI guideline M47. 2.a ed. 2022.
Lee A, Mirrett S, Reller LB, et al. Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: how many blood cultures are needed? J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(11):3546-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01555-07
Palavecino EL, Campodónico VL, She RC. Laboratory approaches to determining blood culture contamination rates: an ASM Laboratory Practices Subcommittee report. J Clin Microbiol. 2024;62(2):e0102823. doi:10.1128/jcm.01028-23
Sautter RL, Parrott JS, Nachamkin I, et al. American Society for Microbiology evidence-based laboratory medicine practice guidelines to reduce blood culture contamination rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024;37(4):e0008724. doi:10.1128/cmr.00087-24
Ombelet S, Barbé B, Affolabi D, et al. Best practices of blood cultures in low- and middle-income countries. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019;6:131. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00131
Caldeira D, David C, Sampaio C. Skin antiseptics in venous puncture-site disinfection for prevention of blood culture contamination: systematic review with meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2011;77(3):223-32. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2010.10.015
Story-Roller E, Weinstein MP. Chlorhexidine versus tincture of iodine for reduction of blood culture contamination rates: a prospective randomized crossover study. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(12):3007-9. doi:10.1128/JCM.01457-16
Ramirez P, Gordón M. Antisepsia en la extracción de hemocultivos. Tasa de contaminación de hemocultivos. Med Intensiva. 2019;43:31-4. doi:10.1016/j.medin.2018.08.007
Frota OP, Silva RM, Ruiz JS, et al. Impact of sterile gloves on blood-culture contamination rates: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Infect Control. 2022;50(1):49-53. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2021.08.030
Srikanth KK, Lotfollahzadeh S. Phlebotomy [Internet]. StatPearls; 2025, enero. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK574569/
Ota K, Oba K, Fukui K, et al. Sites of blood collection and topical antiseptics associated with contaminated cultures: prospective observational study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6211. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85614-7
Snyder SR, Favoretto AM, Baetz RA, et al. Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood culture contamination: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Biochem. 2012;45(13-14):999-1011. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.06.007
Azem RM, Ransom EM. Blood culture optimization: practical tips. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2022;44(17):151-60. doi:10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2022.08.005
Huber S, Hetzer B, Crazzolara R, et al. The correct blood volume for paediatric blood cultures: a conundrum? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(2):168-73. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2019.10.006
Papavarnavas NS, Brink AJ, Dlamini S, et al. Practice update to optimize the performance and interpretation of blood cultures: 2022. S Afr Med J. 2022;112(6):397-402. doi:10.7196/SAMJ.2022.v112i6.16537
Leber AL. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press; 2016.
Heroes AS. Delayed incubation of blood culture bottles-recommendations for preincubation temperature and time [Internet]. Institute of Tropical Medicine Antwerp. 2023. Disponible en: https://webshare.zenya.work/308myyz7034vz048/Document.aspx?websharedocumentid=0860eb0a-5b9d-4c72-8bd9-dc22b7f4a2c2
Ling CL, Roberts T, Soeng S, et al. Impact of delays to incubation and storage temperature on blood culture results: a multi-centre study. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(173). doi:10.1186/s12879-021-05872-8
Ransom EM, Alipour Z, Wallace MA, et al. Evaluation of optimal blood culture incubation time to maximize clinically relevant results from a contemporary blood culture instrument and media system. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(3):e02459-20. doi:10.1128/JCM.02459-20
Ulrich PS, Bastian IN, Chen DJ. Clinical significance of BD Bactec FX blood culture incubation beyond 96 hours (4 days). J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60(7):e0054922. doi:10.1128/jcm.00549-22
Hashimoto T, Yahiro T, Khan S, et al. Validity of reducing blood culture incubation time for the BD BACTEC FX blood culture system considering microbiological and clinical aspects. J Infect Chemother. 2024;31(1):102522. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.011
Fihman V, Faury H, Moussafeur A, et al. Blood cultures for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis: what is the benefit of prolonged incubation? J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5824. doi:10.3390/jcm10245824
Petti CA, Bhally HS, Weinstein MP, et al. Utility of extended blood culture incubation for isolation of Haemophilus, Actinobacillus, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella organisms: a retrospective multicenter evaluation. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(1):257-9. doi:10.1128/JCM.44.1.257-259.2006
Van Ingen J, Hilt N, Bosboom R. Education of phlebotomy teams improves blood volume in blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(3):1020-1. doi:10.1128/JCM.03068-12
Gehring T, Kim H, Hoerauf A, et al. A prospective study on the effect of time-shifted telephone reporting of blood culture microscopy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(5):973-5. doi:10.1007/s10096-019-03544-9
Barenfanger J, Graham DR, Kolluri L, et al. Decreased mortality associated with prompt Gram staining of blood cultures. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(6):870-6. doi:10.1309/AJCPVMDQU2ZJDPBL
Doern GV., Carroll KC, Diekema DJ, et al. A comprehensive update on the problem of blood culture contamination and a discussion of methods for addressing the problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33(1):e00009. doi:10.1128/CMR.00009-19
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Primary measure: blood culture contamination rate [Internet]. Laboratory Quality. 2024 [citado 18 de diciembre de 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.cdc.gov/lab-quality/php/prevent-adult-blood-culture-contamination/primary-measure.html#toc
So MK, Chung HS, Kim CJ, et al. Effects of blood volume monitoring on the rate of positive blood cultures from the Emergency Room. Annals Clin Microbiol. 2016;19(3):70-5. doi:10.5145/ACM.2016.19.3.70
Lin P-C, Chang C-L, Chung Y-H, et al. Revisiting factors associated with blood culture positivity: Critical factors after the introduction of automated continuous monitoring blood culture systems. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(30):e29693. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000029693
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Selective reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results: a primer for antibiotic stewardship programs [Internet]. 2020 [citado 18 de diciembre 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/pdfs/Selective-Reporting-508.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Coralith Garcia, Lizeth Astocondor, Noemi Hinostroza, Valeria Gordillo-Leo, Fiorella Krapp
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors assign their rights to the RMH so that may disseminate the article through the means at their disposal. The journal will provide forms of affidavit of authorship and authorization for the publication of the article, which shall be submitted with the manuscript. Authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, perform and publicly communicate their article, or part of it, mentioning the original publication in the journal.
