Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program

Authors

  • Mónica L. Flores Noriega Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.
  • Luz Carbajal Arroyo Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5448-3528

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v32i2.3980

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the validity and reliability of results obtained using the MEDUCPG14 instrument as well as to describe the results of the academic evaluation of surgical resident programs of a private university. Methods: A cross- sectional study was performed; the instrument was applied to 77 residents of surgical programs of Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and to 41 professors. Results: A reliability coefficient of 0.959 was obtained. Two domains were found: teaching, feedback and evaluation (11 items) attained a coefficient of 0.957 and respectful treatment (3 items) attained a coefficient of 0.923. Answer rate was higher than 90%. No difference by age, gender and subspecialty was found. Conclusion: MEDUCPG-14 has adequate validity and reliability to evaluate academic performance in surgical resident programs. Four or more evaluations per professor are needed; no difference by age, sex and subspecialty was found.

Published

2021-07-19

How to Cite

1.
Flores Noriega ML, Carbajal Arroyo L. Academic evaluation of surgical resident programs through the MEDUCPG14 program. Rev Med Hered [Internet]. 2021 Jul. 19 [cited 2024 Apr. 16];32(2):72-8. Available from: https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/3980

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Most read articles by the same author(s)