Position accuracy of short abutment analogs in the working model splinted with dental floss versus Bis-Acryl bars in total edentulous mandibles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v34i2.5528Keywords:
Dental implants, dental prosthesis, dental impression techniques, dental flossAbstract
Objective: To compare in vitro the positional accuracy of short abutment analogs splinted with dental floss versus short abutment analogs splinted with Bis-Acryl bars as a preliminary step to obtaining the working model in the preparation of implant-supported prostheses in total edentulous mandibles. Materials and methods: An aluminum master model simulating an edentulous mandible with five analogues was prepared. Using a customized tray and by means of a technique for fixing the transfers to it, thirty impressions were recorded, which were divided into three groups: SF group (without splinting), FHD group (splinting with dental floss) and FBA group (splinting with Bis-Acryl bars). Subsequently, a digital indoor micrometer was used to perform distance and height measurements between analogs. The statistical tests used were Shapiro Wilks, ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc. Results: For distance measurements, no statistically significant differences were found between groups (p = 0.674). For height, statistically significant differences were found between groups (p < 0.001). Bis-Acryl presented differences with the SF and FHD groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Splinting of short abutment analogs did not present significant differences in the distance measurement; however, it did present differences in the height measurement, specifically between the FBA group with the SF and FHD groups.
References
Cordioli G, Brugnolo E, Lazzara RJ, Mazzocco C, Venturelli A. Osteoingrazione Nella Pratica Clinica. 2nd ed. Quinto Vicentino: Grafiche Wanda; 1995.
The Glossary Of Prosthodontic Terms. Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(1):10–92.
Rodrigues DM. Manual de Prótesis sobre Implantes. Sao Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2007.
Gallucci GO, Papaspyridakos P, Ashy LM, Kim GE, Brady NJ, Weber H-P. Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(5):469–72.
Nakhaei M, Madani AS, Moraditalab A, Haghi HR. Three-dimensional accuracy of different impression techniques for dental implants. Dent Res J. 2015;12(5):431–8.
Queiroz D a, Cunha LG, Duarte JLP, Neves a CC, da Silva-Concilio LR. Influence of the casting material on the dimensional accuracy of dental dies. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(4):357–61.
Michalakis KX, Asar NV, Kapsampeli V, Magkavali-Trikka P, Pissiotis AL, Hirayama H. Delayed linear dimensional changes of five high strength gypsum products used for the fabrication of definitive casts. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(3):189–95.
De Cesero L, Mota EG, Burnett LH, Spohr AM. The influence of postpouring time on the roughness, compressive strength, and diametric tensile strength of dental stone. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(6):1573–7.
Pickett C, Devine W, Jaroslow B. Understanding Dental Gypsum: A Dental Lab Professional’s Guide to All Things Gypsum [Internet]. 2015. p. 1–12. Available from: http://info.whipmix.com/understanding-dental-gypsum-ebook
Proença S, Suzuki MM, Cesar S, Hirata BS, Lopes MB, Fernando E, et al. Influence of different water types on the physical and mechanical properties of gypsum. 2015;14(3):199–203.
Ebadian B, Rismanchian M, Dastgheib B, Bajoghli F. Effect of different impression materials and techniques on the dimensional accuracy of implant definitive casts. Dent Res J. 2015;12(2):136–43.
De Avila ÉD, Moraes F de M, Castanharo SM, Del´Acqua MA, Mollo FDA. Effect of Splinting in Accuracy of Two Implant Impression Techniques. J Oral Implantol. 2014;XL(6):633–9.
De Avila ÉD, Barros LAB, Del’Acqua MA, Castanharo SM, Mollo FDA. Comparison of the accuracy for three dental impression techniques and index: An in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57(4):268–74.
Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N. Evaluation of the accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(6):1512–20.
De Faria KO, Da Silveira-Júnior CD, Da Silva-Neto JP, De Mattos M da GC, Da Silva MR, Das Neves FD. Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2013;12(1):37–40.
Lanis A. Reducing Distortion of Implant- or Abutment-Level Impressions for Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation : A Technique Report. 2015;84–90.
Baig MR. Accuracy of impressions of multiple implants in the edentulous arch: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(4):869–80.
Papaspyridakos P, Lal MSK, George MS, White S, Weber H, Dent M, et al. Effect of Splinted and Nonsplinted Impression Techniques on the Accuracy of Fit of Fixed Implant Prostheses in Edentulous Patients : A Comparative Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2011;26(6):1267–73.
Lang R, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Dent M. Fracture Resistance of PMMA and Resin Matrix Composite–Based Interim FPD Materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(4):381–5.
Resin GP. Manual GC Pattern Resin®. 2012. p. 1–12.
Gibbs SB, Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Ahuja S. Comparison of polymerization shrinkage of pattern resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):293–8.
DMG Chemisch-Pharmazeutische Fabrik. Luxatemp Star®. 2015;1–122.
Haselton DR, Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA. Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(2):225–8.
Misch CE. Prótesis dental sobre implantes. 1st ed. Madrid: Elseiver; 2007. 1016 p.
Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH BP. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant-supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;May(83(5)):555–61.
Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: An optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):676–81.
Torres M. Comparación de la precisión de transferencia de pilares cortos utilizando la ferulización de transferentes con hilo dental revestido de resina acrílica versus la ferulización de transferentes a la cubeta con resina acrílica. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2017.
Hoods-Moonsammy V, Owen CP, Howes D. A Comparison of the Accuracy of Polyether, Polyvinyl Siloxane, and Plaster Impressions for Long-Span Implant-Supported Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27(5):433–8.
Poquioma C. Comparación de la precisión de la posición de análogos de pilares cortos mediante la ferulización con hilo dental revestido con resina acrílica versus la ferulización con barras de resina acrílica en la fabricación del modelo de trabajo. Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia; 2016.
Ha J-Y, Kim S-H, Kim K-H, Kwon T-Y. Influence of the volumes of Bis-acryl and poly(methyl methacrylate) resins on their exothermic behavior during polymerization. Dent Mater J. 2011;30(3):336–42.
Kim S, Watts DC. Exotherm behavior of the polymer-based provisional crown and fixed partial denture materials. 2004;383–7.
Matta RE, Adler W, Wichmann M, Heckmann SM. Accuracy of impression scanning compared with stone casts of implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent. Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry; 2016;1–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lizzeth Fiorella Huaytalla Oré, Carlos Matta Morales, Leyla Delgado-Cotrina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons License, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work, and to the first publication in this journal.
