Aproximaciones para comprender y prevenir la violencia obstétrica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/spirat.v1i2.4479Keywords:
Obstetric Violence, medicalization of birth, gender-based violence, PowerAbstract
Objective: to present a critical analysis of the literature that addressed the emergence of obstetric violence as a concept and its characteristics; emphasizing the contributions it offers to compensate obstetric care studies and practices and identify intervention opportunities to prevent it from the academic field of teaching and research. Central analysis of the theme: The definition of obstetric violence has been brewing since the early 1980s when feminist and women's initiatives in South America began to collect; and in confluence with the social sciences, to systematically investigate the testimonies about the experience of women, clearly describing institutional births as a violent experience; the perspectives of health personnel and the different causes. While in alliances, with midwives, doulas and obstetricians, they promoted the movement for humanized childbirth or respected childbirth. Contribution: The use of the concept of obstetric violence allows not only to monitor and punish those who correspond; but in that it gives us the opportunity and responsibility to rethink and modify our own training and medical practice, the care procedures and processes, and the relationships and interactions between health personnel and patients in the health system; between men and women in society.
Downloads
References
Referencias
(1) Freedman LP, Kujawski SA, Mbuyita S, Kuwawenaruwa A, Kruk ME, Ramsey K, et al. Eye of the beholder? Observation versus self-report in the measurement of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 27 de agosto de 2018;26(53):107-22. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502024
(2) Dutton J, Knight L. Reproducing neglect in the place of care: Normalised violence within Cape Town Midwifery Obstetric Units. Agenda [Internet]. 2 de enero de 2020;34(1):14-22. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2019.1704481
(3) Klein MC, Sakala C, Simkin P, Davis-Floyd R, Rooks JP, Pincus J. Why do women go along with this stuff? Birth Berkeley Calif. septiembre de 2006;33(3):245-50.
(4) WHO. The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. [Internet]. 2014. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/134588
(5) Gobierno del Perú. “Plan Nacional Contra la Violencia de Género 2016- 2021”, DS N°008-2016-MIMP. Decreto Supremo N°008-2016-MIMP. jul 26, 2016.
(6) Ministerio de Salud. Norma Técnica No. 180-MINSA/DGIESP-2021 Para la prevención y eliminación de la violencia de género en los establecimientos de salud que brinden servicios de salud sexual y reproductiva. Norma técnica No. 180-MINSA/DGIESP-2021, RM 031-2022-MINSA ene 28, 2022.
(7) CLADEM. Silencio y Complicidad. Violencia contra las mujeres en los servicios ´públcos de salud en el Perú. Lima; 1998.
(8) Villarmea S, Olza I, Recio A. El parto es nuestro: El impacto de una asociación de usuarias en la reforma del sistema obstétrico de España. Dilemata [Internet]. 2015;7(18):157-83. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5106942
(9) Diniz SG, Salgado H de O, Andrezzo HF de A, de Carvalho PGC, Carvalho PCA, Aguiar C de A, et al. Abuse and disrespect in childbirth care as a public health issue in Brazil: Origins, definitions, impacts on maternal health, and proposals for its prevention. J Hum Growth Dev. 2015;25(3):377-82.
(10) Pozzio MR. L a gineco - obst etricia en México : entre el “parto humanizado” y la violencia obstetrica. Rev Estud Fem. 2016;24(1):101-17.
(11) Vela G. Percepción de la paciente sobre la atención del parto humanizado en el Servicio de Centro Obstétrico del Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal durante el periodo marzo-abril de 2015 [Internet] [Licenciatura en Obstetricia]. [Lima, Perú]: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Facultad de Medicina; 2015. Disponible en: https://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12672/4278/Vela_cg.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
(12) Biurrun-Garrido A, Goberna-Tricas J. La humanización del trabajo de parto: necesidad de definir el concepto. Revisión de la bibliografía. Matronas Prof. 2013;14(2):62-6.
(13) Silva A, Pantoja F, Millón Y, Hidalgo V, Stojanova J, Arancibia M, et al. Stakeholders’ perceptions of humanized birth practices and obstetric violence in Chile: A scoping review. Medwave. 21 de octubre de 2020;20(9):e8047.
(14) Davis DA. Obstetric Racism: The Racial Politics of Pregnancy, Labor, and Birthing. Med Anthropol [Internet]. 3 de octubre de 2019;38(7):560-73. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1549389
(15) Davis-Floyd R, Sargent C. The social production of authoritative knowledge in pregnancy and childbirth. Med Anthropol Q. junio de 1996;10(2):111-20.
(16) Davis-Floyd R. Culture and birth: the technocratic imperative. Birth Gaz. Winter de 1994;11(1):24-5.
(17) Ginsburg F, Rapp R. The politics of reproduction. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1991;20:311-43.
(18) Bourgeault I, Declercq E, Sandall J. Changing birth. Birth by Design: Pregnancy, Maternity Care and Midwifery in North America and Northern Europe. 2001. 51–69.
(19) Freedman LP. Shifting visions: «delegation» policies and the building of a «rights-based» approach to maternal mortality. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1972 [Internet]. enero de 2002;57(3):154-8. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12146607
(20) Berer M. Repoliticising sexual and reproductive health and rights. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. noviembre de 2011;19(38):4-10. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22118137
(21) Physicians for Human Rights. Deadly Delays Maternal mortality in Peru. A rights-based approach to safe motherhood [Internet]. Revista peruana de población. 1993 ene p. 33-56. Report No.: 3. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19597198
(22) Barragués Fernández A. Accountability for sexual and reproductive health and rights in development practice: building synergies. Sex Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2020;28(1):1848399. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2020.1848399
(23) Grilo Diniz CS, Rattner D, Lucas d’Oliveira AFP, de Aguiar JM, Niy DY. Disrespect and abuse in childbirth in Brazil: social activism, public policies and providers’ training. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 27 de agosto de 2018;26(53):19-35. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502019
(24) Samuel J. Struggling with the State:Rights-based Governance of Reproductive Health Services in Puno, Peru [Doctor of Philosophy]. University of Toronto; 2015.
(25) Austveg B. Perpetuating power: some reasons why reproductive health has stalled. Reprod Health Matters. 2011;19(38):26-34.
(26) Dahan O, Cohen Shabot S. Not just mechanical birthing bodies: articulating the impact of imbalanced power relationships in the birth arena on women’s subjectivity, agency, and consciousness. Mind Cult Act [Internet]. 2022;29(3):256-68. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2022.2110262
(27) Davis-Floyd R, Davis E. Intuition as authoritative knowledge in midwifery and homebirth. Med Anthropol Q. junio de 1996;10(2):237-69.
(28) Löwy I, Sanabria E. A biomedicalização de corpos brasileiros: Perspectivas antropológicas. Hist Cienc Saude - Manguinhos. 2016;23(1):14-6.
(29) Lossio J, Iguiñiz-Romero R, Robledo P. For the good of the nation: scientific discourses endorsing the medicalization of childbirth in Peru, 1900-1940. Hist Cienc Saude--Manguinhos. diciembre de 2018;25(4):943-57.
(30) Guerra-Reyes L. Changing birth in the Andes: Safe motherhood, culture and policy in Peru. Diss Abstr Int Sect Humanit Soc Sci [Internet]. 2014;75(3-A(E)):No Pagination Specified. Disponible en: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&D=psyc11&AN=2014-99170-498
(31) Strong AE, White TL. Re-examining Norms of Disrespect and Abuse in the Second Stage of Labor in Tanzanian Maternity Care. Med Anthropol [Internet]. 19 de mayo de 2021;40(4):307-21. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2021.1884075
(32) Madhiwalla N, Ghoshal R, Mavani P, Roy N. Identifying disrespect and abuse in organisational culture: a study of two hospitals in Mumbai, India. Reprod Health Matters. 2018;26(53):36-47.
(33) Liese KL, Davis-Floyd R, Stewart K, Cheyney M. Obstetric iatrogenesis in the United States: the spectrum of unintentional harm, disrespect, violence, and abuse. Anthropol Med [Internet]. 3 de abril de 2021;28(2):188-204. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2021.1938510
(34) Sadler M, Santos MJ, Ruiz-Berd??n D, Rojas GL, Skoko E, Gillen P, et al. Moving beyond disrespect and abuse: addressing the structural dimensions of obstetric violence. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 2016;24(47):47-55. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.002
(35) Castro A, Savage V. Obstetric Violence as Reproductive Governance in the Dominican Republic.Med Anthropol [Internet]. 17 de febrero de 2019 [citado 21 de febrero de 2023];38(2):123-36. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01459740.2018.1512984
(36) Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med.2015;12(6):1-32.
(37) Diaz-Tello F. Invisible wounds: obstetric violence in the United States. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 2016;24(47):56-64. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2016.04.004
(38) Goncalves da silva Mi, y otros. Violencia obstetrica na visao de enfermeiras obstetras. Rev Rede Enferm Nordeste. 2014;15(4):720-8.
(39) Chattopadhyay S, Mishra A, Jacob S. ‘Safe’, yet violent? Women’s experiences with obstetric violence during hospital births in rural Northeast India. Cult Health Sex [Internet]. 3 de julio de 2018;20(7):815-29. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1384572
(40) Maya ET, Adu-Bonsaffoh K, Dako-Gyeke P, Badzi C, Vogel JP, Bohren MA, et al. Women’s perspectives of mistreatment during childbirth at health facilities in Ghana: findings from a qualitative study. Reprod Health Matters [Internet]. 2018;26(53):70-87. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2018.1502020
(41) Terán DP, Castellanos C, González Blanco M, Ramos D. Violencia obstétrica: percepción de las usuarias. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2013;7373(33):171-80.
(42) Martínez-Galiano JM, Rodríguez-Almagro J, Rubio-Álvarez A, Ortiz-Esquinas I, Ballesta-Castillejos A, Hernández-Martínez A. Obstetric Violence from a Midwife Perspective. Int J Environ Res PublicHealth. 2023;20(6).
(43) Gray T, Mohan S, Lindow S, Farrell T. Obstetric violence: Clinical staff perceptions from a video of simulated practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X [Internet]. 2019;1:100007. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100007
(44) Faneite, J; Feo A, Toro J. Grado de conocimiento de violencia obstétrica por el personal de salud. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venezuela. 2012;72(1):4-12.
(45) Vacaflor CH. Obstetric violence: a new framework for identifying challenges to maternal healthcare in Argentina. Reprod Health Matters. 2016;24(47):65-73.
(46) Castrillo B. Dime quién lo define y te diré si es violento Reflexiones sobre la violencia obstétrica. Sex Salud Soc Rev Latinoam. 2016;24.
(47) Laako H. Los derechos humanos en los movimientos sociales: el caso de las parteras autónomas en México. Rev Mex Cienc Políticas Sociales. LXI(227 mayo-agosto):167-194.
(48) Davis-Floyd R. La partera profesional: articulating identity and cultural space for a new kind of midwife in Mexico. Med Anthropol. 2001;20(2-3):185-243.
(49) Lokugamage AU, Pathberiya SDC. Human rights in childbirth, narratives and restorative justice: a review. Reprod Health. 2 de febrero de 2017;14(1):17.
(50) Diniz CSG, Bussadori JC de C, Lemes LB, Moisés ECD, Prado CA de C, McCourt C. A change laboratory for maternity care in Brazil: Pilot implementation of Mother Baby Friendly Birthing Initiative. Med Teach [Internet]. 2 de enero de 2021;43(1):19-26. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1791319
(51) Gina Lyset Ayala Gutierrez. Calidad de la atención del parto según percepción de las usuarias en el servicio de centro obstétrico en el Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal. Enero-Febrero 2015. 2015;1-47. Disponible en: http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/bitstream/cybertesis/4059/1/Ayala_gg.pdf
(52) Jardim DMB, Modena CM. Obstetric violence in the daily routine of care and its characteristics. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26:e3069.
(53) Savage V, Castro A. Measuring mistreatment of women during childbirth: a review of terminology and methodological approaches. Reprod Health. 26 de octubre de 2017;14(1):138.
(54) Fernández Guillén F. ¿Qué es la violencia obstétrica? Algunos aspectos sociales, éticos y jurídicos. Dilemata [Internet]. 2015;7(8):113-28. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5106937Rev. Spirat. 2023;1(2): 43-53.
(55) Silva A, Pantoja F, Millón Y, Hidalgo V, Stojanova J, Arancibia M, et al. Percepción de actores involucrados acerca del parto humanizado y la violencia obstétrica en Chile: una revisión panorámica. Medwave. 2020;20(9):e8047.
(56) Ravaldi C, Skoko E, Battisti A, Cericco M, Vannacci A. Abuse and disrespect in childbirth assistance in Italy: A community-based survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 1 de mayo de 2018;224:208-9. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211518301532
(57) Annborn A, Finnbogadóttir HR. Obstetric violence a qualitative interview study. Midwifery [Internet]. 1 de febrero de 2022;105:103212. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613821002874
1.png)
