Effectiveness of an educational strategy in increasing the prescription of adequate thromboprophylaxis in the internal medicine service of general hospital

Authors

  • Sergio Vásquez Kunze Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima. Perú.
  • Hector Sosa Valle Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima. Perú.
  • Natalí Leiva Reyes Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima. Perú.
  • César Loza Munarriz Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima. Perú.
  • Alejandro Pulcha Guerra Clínica San Felipe, Lima. Perú.
  • Homarh Villaverde Peláez Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Lima. Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v35i1.5295

Keywords:

Prevention and control, venous thrombosis, education

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether an educational intervention strategy would improve the frequency of medical prescriptions for adequate thromboprophylaxis in a medicine service. Methods: Quasi-experimental study, in which in the pre-intervention phase the frequencies of indication of appropriate thromboprophylaxis by physicians from the medicine service were obtained. An 8-week educational intervention was carried out with this same group of doctors. In the post-intervention phase, the frequency of adequate thromboprophylaxis was measured at 2 and 4 months after the intervention. Results: The educational intervention was implemented in 112 resident physicians in medicine specialties. All prescriptions were made by the first-year resident physicians and endorsed by their supervising physician. Prior to the intervention, 47 (44.35%) adequate prescriptions were obtained, 13 (12.26%) suboptimal, 4 (3.77%) inadequate, and 42 (39, 62%) no prescription. After the intervention, the following 2 months were obtained: 78 (75.72%) adequate prescriptions, 7 (6.79%) suboptimal, 4 (2.91%) inadequate and 15 (14.58%) no prescriptions, there being a significant difference with the baseline level. At the subsequent 4 months post-intervention, the following were obtained: 86 (83.49%) adequate, 5 (4.85%) suboptimal, 2 (1.94%) inadequate and 10 (9.72%) no prescription, with a difference significant with the baseline level. There was no increase in the frequency of overuse. Conclusions: The application of an educational strategy to medical personnel was effective in increasing correctly indicated thromboprophylaxis prescriptions in a medical service. No overuse of thromboprophylaxis was found after the intervention.

References

Barbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, et al. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost. 2010; 8 (11):2450 – 2457.

Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, et al. Executive summary. Anti-thrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012; 141:7S-47S.

Goldhaber SZ, Tapson VF, DVT FREE Steering Committee. A prospective registry of 5451 patients with ultrasound confirmed deep venous thrombosis. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93:259-62.

Amin A, Stemkowski S, Lin J, et al. Thromboprophylaxis rates in US medical centers: success or failure? J Thromb Haemost. 2007; 5(8):1610-6.

Tapson VF, Decousus H, Pini M, et al. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Acutely ill Hospitalizad Medical Patients: Findings from the Internacional Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism. Chest. 2007; 132:936-45.

Ageno W, Squizzato A, Ambrosini F, et al. Thrombosis prophylaxis in medical patients: a retrospective review of clinical practice patterns. Haematologica. 2002; 87:746-50.

Arnold DM, Kahn SR, Shrier I.et al. Missed opportunities for prevention of venous thromboembolism: an evaluation of the use of thromboprophylaxis guidelines. Chest. 2001; 120:1964-71.

Schünemann HJ, Cook D, Grimshaw J, et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: from evidence to application. Chest. 2004; 126(suppl):688S-99S.

Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012; 141(2)(Suppl):e195S–e226S.

Cohn SL, Adekile A, Mahabir V. Improved use of thromboprophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis following an educational intervention. J Hosp Med. 2006; 1:331–338.

Dobesh PP, Stacy ZA. Effect of a clinical pharmacy education program on improvement in the quantity and quality of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for medically ill patients. J Manag Care Pharm. 2005; 11:755–762.

Kucher N, Koo S, Quiroz R, et al. Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:969–77.

Stinnett JM, Pendleton R, Skordos L et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medically ill patients and the development of strategies to improve prophylaxis rates. Am J Hematol. 2005; 78:167–172.

Khorana A. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines on Venous Thromboembolic Disease: strategies for improving VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized cancer patients. The Oncologist. 2007; 12:1361–1370.

Chopard P, Dörffler-Melly J, Hess U, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. Definite need for improvement. J Intern Med. 2005; 257(4): 352-7.

Kahn SR1, Morrison DR, Cohen JM, et al. Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 16;(7): CD008201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008201.pub2. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4:CD008201.

Published

2024-03-27

How to Cite

1.
Vásquez Kunze S, Sosa Valle H, Leiva Reyes N, Loza Munarriz C, Pulcha Guerra A, Villaverde Peláez H. Effectiveness of an educational strategy in increasing the prescription of adequate thromboprophylaxis in the internal medicine service of general hospital . Rev Méd Hered [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 27 [cited 2024 Apr. 27];35(1):23-9. Available from: https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/RMH/article/view/5295

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL RESEARCH