Performance and perceptions of dental students when using a haptic simulator for tooth preparation for a metal-free crown
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v36i1.6531Keywords:
simulation training, haptic technology, motor skills, dental education, virtual realityAbstract
Objective: To describe the performance and analyze the perceptions of dental students at a private university in Metropolitan Lima when using a haptic simulator for the tooth preparation of a metal-free crown in the posterior region. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and observational study. Twenty-seven students participated, performing tooth preparation for a metal-free crown on a lower molar using the Simodont® Dental Trainer haptic simulator. Performance was evaluated using a rubric with six parameters (maximum score of 20 points), and the activity was classified as passing (≥11) or failing (<11). Perception of the simulator’s usefulness was measured using a five-point Likert-type survey. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed using nonparametric tests (p < 0.05). Results: 66.67% of the students failed the overall assessment of manual dexterity. Occlusal wear had the highest percentage of unacceptable results (70.37%), and 100% of the participants affected the adjacent teeth. In contrast, the convergence angle showed 74.07% satisfactory results. The overall perception of the simulator was positive (median = 4). Significant associations were found between performance in occlusal wear and the perception of similarity to the actual dental turbine (p = 0.041) and handle control (p = 0.043), as well as between the convergence angle and manual comfort (p = 0.010). Conclusions: Although students reported a favorable perception of the haptic simulator, technical performance was predominantly suboptimal. These findings suggest that a positive perception does not necessarily translate into immediate competence. Haptic simulation should be integrated in a structured and progressive manner into preclinical training, always incorporating instructor feedback.
Downloads
References
Annamma LM, Varma S, Abuttayem H, et al. Current challenges in dental education- a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1523. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06545-1
Sohail FA, Iqbal M, Malik MG, et al. Perspectives of faculty, students and patients on clinical skills teaching in undergraduate medical education in Pakistan: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2025;15(11):e103139. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103139
Kızılırmak B, Gözen M, Güntekin N. Evaluation of dental students’ tooth preparation skills using conventional phantom labs versus advanced simulation technologies: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):1365. doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08020-x
Felszeghy S, Huhtela O, Manninen K, et al. VR-haptic and phantom head dental training: does the order matter? A comparative study from a preclinical fixed prosthodontics course. Int J Comput Dent. 2024;27(4):389-99. doi:10.3290/j.ijcd.b4451364
Grandez KE. Simuladores en odontología y la formación de habilidades clínicas. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2021;24(3):261-7. doi:10.15381/os.v24i3.20717
Liu L, Zhou R, Yuan S, et al. Simulation training for ceramic crown preparation in the dental setting using a virtual educational system. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;24(2):199-206. doi:10.1111/eje.12485
Urbankova A, Palomo L, Engebretson SP. A complex haptic exercise to predict pre‐clinic operative dentistry performance: a prospective study. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(12):1628-33. doi:10.1002/jdd.13082
Bandiaky ON, Lopez S, Hamon L, et al. Impact of haptic simulators in preclinical dental education: a systematic review. J Dent Educ. 2024;88(3):366-79. doi:10.1002/jdd.13426
Wei Y, Peng Z. Application of Simodont virtual simulation system for preclinical teaching of access and coronal cavity preparation. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(12):e0315732. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315732
Hattori A, Tonami K, Tsuruta J, et al. Effect of the haptic 3D virtual reality dental training simulator on assessment of tooth preparation. J Dent Sci. 2022;17(1):514-20. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2021.06.022
Almeida MR, de Melo E. Sistemas cerâmicos odontológicos: uma revisão da literatura. J Multidiscip Dent. 2024;14(1):54-62. doi:10.46875/jmd.v14i1.1050
Habib SR. Rubric system for evaluation of crown preparation performed by dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22(3):e506-13. doi:10.1111/eje.12333
Fernández-Sagredo M, Barrios-Penna C, Torres-Martínez P, et al. Percepción de la utilidad de los simuladores virtuales hápticos en educación odontológica por estudiantes, profesionales y académicos: estudio descriptivo observacional. FEM. 2020;23(2):89-94. doi:10.33588/fem.232.1045
Patil S, Bhandi S, Awan KH, et al. Effectiveness of haptic feedback devices in preclinical training of dental students - A systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):739. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03410-3
Stoilov L, Stephan F, Stark H, et al. Efficacy of virtual preparation simulators compared to traditional preparations on phantom heads. Dent J. 2024;12(8):259. doi:10.3390/dj12080259
Hey J, Schweyen R, Kupfer P, et al. Influence of preparation design on the quality of tooth preparation in preclinical dental education. J Dent Sci. 2017;12(1):27-32. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2016.05.002
Vincent M, Giess R, Balthazard R, et al. Virtual aids and students’ performance with haptic simulation in implantology. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(8):1015-22. doi:10.1002/jdd.12916
Hadjichristou C, Kokoti M, Bakopoulou A. Haptics in fixed prosthodontics and their role in dental education: a literature review. J Dent Educ. 2024;88(8):1020-8. doi:10.1002/jdd.13533
Rodrigues P, Nicolau F, Norte M, et al. Preclinical dental students self-assessment of an improved operative dentistry virtual reality simulator with haptic feedback. Sci Rep. 2023;13:2823. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29537-5
Amine M, Wahid HO, Fahi S, et al. Assessment of convergence angle of tooth preparations for complete crowns among dental students: typodont vs simulator. Int J Dent. 2022;2022(1):7615892. doi:10.1155/2022/7615892
Arora O, Sivaswamy V, Ahmed N, et al. Effectiveness of digital visualization in teaching crown preparation to predoctoral dental students - a pilot study. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2023;30(12):e168-73. doi:10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.12.019
Saravia-Rojas M, Mendiola-Aquino C, Geng-Vivanco R. Virtual haptic reality: a teaching strategy to achieve significant learning in dentistry. Can J Educ Soc Stud. 2023;3(3):46-52. doi:10.53103/cjess.v3i3.142
Chávez-Alayo P, Fukuhara-Nakama M, Fernández-Jacinto L. Práctica previa odontológica de un caso clínico en simulación háptica antes del tratamiento en el paciente. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2024;34(2):191-4. doi:10.20453/reh.v34i2.5537
Gramatges-Rojas A, Sittoni-Pino MF, Flacco N, et al. Can haptic reinforced VR simulation transform preclinical pulpotomy training? Insights into skill acquisition, student perceptions, and educational impact: randomized controlled trial. Front Oral Health. 2025;6:1677056. doi:10.3389/froh.2025.1677056
San Diego JP, Newton TJ, Sagoo AK, et al. Learning clinical skills using haptic vs. phantom head dental chair simulators in removal of artificial caries: cluster-randomized trials with two cohorts’ cavity preparation. Dent J. 2022;10(11):198. doi:10.3390/dj10110198
Leung AL, Yeung C, Chu S, et al. Use of computer simulation in dental training with special reference to simodont. Dent J. 2021;9(11):125. doi:10.3390/dj9110125
Farag A, Hashem D. Impact of the haptic virtual reality simulator on dental students’ psychomotor skills in preclinical operative dentistry. Clin Pract. 2021;12(1):17-26. doi:10.3390/clinpract12010003
Casallas-Hernández N, Castillo-Daza CA, González-Guzmán VA. Acceptance and effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Clin Simul Nurs. 2025;105:101765. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101765
Urbankova A. Impact of computerized dental simulation training on preclinical operative dentistry examination scores. J Dent Educ. 2010;74(4):402-9. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.4.tb04885.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Angie Patricia Pichilingue-Orbe, Diana Valeria Alata-Palacios, Alessandra Camila Merejildo-Luna, Pablo Armando Chávez-Alayo, Mary Isabel Fukuhara-Nakama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and cede to the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons License, which allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work, and to the first publication in this journal.


















