Performance and perceptions of dental students when using a haptic simulator for tooth preparation for a metal-free crown

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v36i1.6531

Keywords:

simulation training, haptic technology, motor skills, dental education, virtual reality

Abstract

Objective: To describe the performance and analyze the perceptions of dental students at a private university in Metropolitan Lima when using a haptic simulator for the tooth preparation of a metal-free crown in the posterior region. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive, and observational study. Twenty-seven students participated, performing tooth preparation for a metal-free crown on a lower molar using the Simodont® Dental Trainer haptic simulator. Performance was evaluated using a rubric with six parameters (maximum score of 20 points), and the activity was classified as passing (≥11) or failing (<11). Perception of the simulator’s usefulness was measured using a five-point Likert-type survey. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed using nonparametric tests (p < 0.05). Results: 66.67% of the students failed the overall assessment of manual dexterity. Occlusal wear had the highest percentage of unacceptable results (70.37%), and 100% of the participants affected the adjacent teeth. In contrast, the convergence angle showed 74.07% satisfactory results. The overall perception of the simulator was positive (median = 4). Significant associations were found between performance in occlusal wear and the perception of similarity to the actual dental turbine (p = 0.041) and handle control (p = 0.043), as well as between the convergence angle and manual comfort (p = 0.010). Conclusions: Although students reported a favorable perception of the haptic simulator, technical performance was predominantly suboptimal. These findings suggest that a positive perception does not necessarily translate into immediate competence. Haptic simulation should be integrated in a structured and progressive manner into preclinical training, always incorporating instructor feedback.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Angie Patricia Pichilingue-Orbe, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

Cirujano Dentista

Diana Valeria Alata-Palacios, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

Cirujano Dentista

Alessandra Camila Merejildo-Luna, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

Estudiante de la carrera de estomatología

Pablo Armando Chávez-Alayo, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

Magíster en Estomatología, Especialista en Rehabilitación oral.

Mary Isabel Fukuhara-Nakama, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

.

References

Annamma LM, Varma S, Abuttayem H, et al. Current challenges in dental education- a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1523. doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06545-1

Sohail FA, Iqbal M, Malik MG, et al. Perspectives of faculty, students and patients on clinical skills teaching in undergraduate medical education in Pakistan: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2025;15(11):e103139. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103139

Kızılırmak B, Gözen M, Güntekin N. Evaluation of dental students’ tooth preparation skills using conventional phantom labs versus advanced simulation technologies: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):1365. doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08020-x

Felszeghy S, Huhtela O, Manninen K, et al. VR-haptic and phantom head dental training: does the order matter? A comparative study from a preclinical fixed prosthodontics course. Int J Comput Dent. 2024;27(4):389-99. doi:10.3290/j.ijcd.b4451364

Grandez KE. Simuladores en odontología y la formación de habilidades clínicas. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2021;24(3):261-7. doi:10.15381/os.v24i3.20717

Liu L, Zhou R, Yuan S, et al. Simulation training for ceramic crown preparation in the dental setting using a virtual educational system. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;24(2):199-206. doi:10.1111/eje.12485

Urbankova A, Palomo L, Engebretson SP. A complex haptic exercise to predict pre‐clinic operative dentistry performance: a prospective study. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(12):1628-33. doi:10.1002/jdd.13082

Bandiaky ON, Lopez S, Hamon L, et al. Impact of haptic simulators in preclinical dental education: a systematic review. J Dent Educ. 2024;88(3):366-79. doi:10.1002/jdd.13426

Wei Y, Peng Z. Application of Simodont virtual simulation system for preclinical teaching of access and coronal cavity preparation. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(12):e0315732. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0315732

Hattori A, Tonami K, Tsuruta J, et al. Effect of the haptic 3D virtual reality dental training simulator on assessment of tooth preparation. J Dent Sci. 2022;17(1):514-20. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2021.06.022

Almeida MR, de Melo E. Sistemas cerâmicos odontológicos: uma revisão da literatura. J Multidiscip Dent. 2024;14(1):54-62. doi:10.46875/jmd.v14i1.1050

Habib SR. Rubric system for evaluation of crown preparation performed by dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22(3):e506-13. doi:10.1111/eje.12333

Fernández-Sagredo M, Barrios-Penna C, Torres-Martínez P, et al. Percepción de la utilidad de los simuladores virtuales hápticos en educación odontológica por estudiantes, profesionales y académicos: estudio descriptivo observacional. FEM. 2020;23(2):89-94. doi:10.33588/fem.232.1045

Patil S, Bhandi S, Awan KH, et al. Effectiveness of haptic feedback devices in preclinical training of dental students - A systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):739. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03410-3

Stoilov L, Stephan F, Stark H, et al. Efficacy of virtual preparation simulators compared to traditional preparations on phantom heads. Dent J. 2024;12(8):259. doi:10.3390/dj12080259

Hey J, Schweyen R, Kupfer P, et al. Influence of preparation design on the quality of tooth preparation in preclinical dental education. J Dent Sci. 2017;12(1):27-32. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2016.05.002

Vincent M, Giess R, Balthazard R, et al. Virtual aids and students’ performance with haptic simulation in implantology. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(8):1015-22. doi:10.1002/jdd.12916

Hadjichristou C, Kokoti M, Bakopoulou A. Haptics in fixed prosthodontics and their role in dental education: a literature review. J Dent Educ. 2024;88(8):1020-8. doi:10.1002/jdd.13533

Rodrigues P, Nicolau F, Norte M, et al. Preclinical dental students self-assessment of an improved operative dentistry virtual reality simulator with haptic feedback. Sci Rep. 2023;13:2823. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29537-5

Amine M, Wahid HO, Fahi S, et al. Assessment of convergence angle of tooth preparations for complete crowns among dental students: typodont vs simulator. Int J Dent. 2022;2022(1):7615892. doi:10.1155/2022/7615892

Arora O, Sivaswamy V, Ahmed N, et al. Effectiveness of digital visualization in teaching crown preparation to predoctoral dental students - a pilot study. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2023;30(12):e168-73. doi:10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.12.019

Saravia-Rojas M, Mendiola-Aquino C, Geng-Vivanco R. Virtual haptic reality: a teaching strategy to achieve significant learning in dentistry. Can J Educ Soc Stud. 2023;3(3):46-52. doi:10.53103/cjess.v3i3.142

Chávez-Alayo P, Fukuhara-Nakama M, Fernández-Jacinto L. Práctica previa odontológica de un caso clínico en simulación háptica antes del tratamiento en el paciente. Rev Estomatol Herediana. 2024;34(2):191-4. doi:10.20453/reh.v34i2.5537

Gramatges-Rojas A, Sittoni-Pino MF, Flacco N, et al. Can haptic reinforced VR simulation transform preclinical pulpotomy training? Insights into skill acquisition, student perceptions, and educational impact: randomized controlled trial. Front Oral Health. 2025;6:1677056. doi:10.3389/froh.2025.1677056

San Diego JP, Newton TJ, Sagoo AK, et al. Learning clinical skills using haptic vs. phantom head dental chair simulators in removal of artificial caries: cluster-randomized trials with two cohorts’ cavity preparation. Dent J. 2022;10(11):198. doi:10.3390/dj10110198

Leung AL, Yeung C, Chu S, et al. Use of computer simulation in dental training with special reference to simodont. Dent J. 2021;9(11):125. doi:10.3390/dj9110125

Farag A, Hashem D. Impact of the haptic virtual reality simulator on dental students’ psychomotor skills in preclinical operative dentistry. Clin Pract. 2021;12(1):17-26. doi:10.3390/clinpract12010003

Casallas-Hernández N, Castillo-Daza CA, González-Guzmán VA. Acceptance and effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Clin Simul Nurs. 2025;105:101765. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101765

Urbankova A. Impact of computerized dental simulation training on preclinical operative dentistry examination scores. J Dent Educ. 2010;74(4):402-9. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2010.74.4.tb04885.x

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

1.
Pichilingue-Orbe AP, Alata-Palacios DV, Merejildo-Luna AC, Chávez-Alayo PA, Fukuhara-Nakama MI. Performance and perceptions of dental students when using a haptic simulator for tooth preparation for a metal-free crown. Rev Estomatol Herediana [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 30 [cited 2026 Apr. 7];36(1):e6531. Available from: https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/6531

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES