Comparison of the degree of microleakage in three restorative systems using universal adhesives: an in vitro study

Authors

  • Antonio Rodrigo Cahuayme Chávez Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú.
  • Martín Chávez Méndez Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v33i4.5111

Keywords:

composite resins, adhesives, dental enamel, dentin.

Abstract

Composite resins are the most widely used material for restorations in the last decade. An adhesive system is required to serve as a bonding agent between the tooth structure and the restoration, and universal adhesive systems are used. However, one of the main problems in restorations is microleakage, defined as the passage of bacteria or fluids between the restorative material and the prepared cavity. Objective: To compare the degree of microleakage between three restorative systems using universal adhesives before and after the thermocycling process. Material and methods: Experimental in vitro study with a sample of dental anterior pieces of 120 bovines. Three brands of restorative systems were used for class V restorations: 3M®, FGM®, and Ivoclar®. Each brand had a control group and an experimental group. The experimental groups were subjected to a thermocycling process. After that, the sample was immersed in methylene blue for 24 hours for subsequent cutting and observation under the microscope. Results: The Ivoclar® brand restorative system showed lower microleakage than the 3M® and FGM® brand restorative systems. The chi-square test showed a significant difference between the control and experimental groups. Conclusions: There is a significant difference in the degree of microleakage in Class V restorations using three restorative systems with universal adhesives before and after thermocycling.

Author Biographies

Antonio Rodrigo Cahuayme Chávez, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú.

     

Martín Chávez Méndez, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú.

        

References

Demirel G, Gür G, Eryilmaz M, Altanlar N. The effects of self-etch bio-active dental adhesive systems on bacterial microleakage. J Adhes Sci Technol [Internet]. 2018; 32(10): 1044-1054. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01694243.2017.1402845

Tuncer D, Çelik C, Burçak S, Arhun N. Comparison of microleakage of a multi-mode adhesive system with contemporary adhseives in class II resin restorations. J Adhes Sci Technol [Internet]. 2014. 28(13): 1288-1297. Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01694243.2014.900908

Poskus LT, Placido E, Capel PE. Influence of adhesive system and placement technique on microleakage of resin-based composite restorations. J Adhes Dent [Internet]. 2004; 6(3): 227-232. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15536853/

Castro LO, Medina JE, Huertas G, Moscoso ME, García CR. Grado de microfiltración marginal utilizando adhesivos con técnica de grabado total y selectivo del esmalte. Rev Estomatol Herediana [Internet]. 2018; 28(3): 153-159. Disponible en: https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/3392

Teniza BI, González T, Lemus KP, Suárez DA, Luna JJ, Ortiz E. Estudio comparativo in vitro de microfiltración en un sistema adhesivo de 5ta generación contra un sistema adhesivo universal. Rev Mex Med Forense [Internet]. 2019; 4(2): 7-10. Disponible en: https://revmedforense.uv.mx/index.php/RevINMEFO/article/view/2680

Falconí GM, Molina CG, Velásquez BV, Armas A. Evaluación del grado de microfiltración en restauraciones de resina compuesta, comparando dos sistemas adhesivos tras diferentes períodos de envejecimiento. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq [Internet]. 2016; 27(2): 281-295. Disponible en: https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/odont/article/view/20831

Kunstmann LN, Carpentieri AR. Correlación entre el comportamiento térmico y composición de sistemas adhesivos. Int J Odontostomat [Internet]. 2017; 11(1): 53-60. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2017000100008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

Mandri N, Aguirre A, Zamudio ME. Sistemas adhesivos en odontología restauradora. Odontoestomatología [Internet]. 2015; 17(26): 50-56. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-93392015000200006

Sürmelioğlu D, Hepokur C, Yavuz SA, Aydin U. Evaluation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of different universal adhesive systems. J Conserv Dent [Internet]. 2020; 23(4): 384-389. Disponible en: https://www.jcd.org.in/article.asp?issn=0972-0707;year=2020;volume=23;issue=4;spage=384;epage=389;aulast=Surmelioglu

Bin-Shuwaish MS, AlHussaini AA, AlHudaithy LH, AlDukhiel SA, Al-Jamhan AS. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of resin based composites bonded to chlorhexidine-pretreated dentin by different protocols of a universal adhesive system. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2021; 33(7): 503-510. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905220307744?via%3Dihub

Ghazy M, El-Mowafy O, Roperto R. Microleakage of porcelain machined crowns cemented with self-adhesive or conventional resin cement. J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2010; 19(7): 523-530. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00637.x

Yilmaz F, Murat S, Hakkı I, Ayyıldız S, Kamburoglu K. Effects of magnetic resonance imaging on the microleakage of five restorative materials: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol [Internet]. 2021; 132(2): 239-246. Disponible en: https://www.oooojournal.net/article/S2212-4403(20)31333-X/fulltext

Licla K, Albites U. Grado de microfiltración de un sellante resinoso con diferentes sistemas adhesivos. Odontol Pediatr [Internet]. 2015; 14(2): 120-128. Disponible en: https://op.spo.com.pe/index.php/odontologiapediatrica/article/view/79

Arguello R, Guerrero J, Celis L. In vitro microleakage of three adhesive systems with three different solvents. Rev Odontol Mex [Internet]. 2012; 16(3): 188-192. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=33953

Pereira JR, Vidotti HA, Correa L, Vermudt A, Almeida M, Pamato S. Analysis of microleakage and marginal gap presented by new polymeric systems in class V restorations: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J [Internet]. 2021; 33(3): 156-160. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905219306935?via%3Dihub

Gönülol N, Ertaş E, Yilmaz A, Çankaya S. Effect of thermal aging on microleakage of current flowable composite resins. J Dent Sci [Internet]. 2015; 10(4): 376-382. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S199179021400035X?via%3Dihub

Cuayla MD, Juárez CF. Diferencias de la microfiltración marginal in vitro de adhesivos de quinta generación y universales en restauraciones clase I con resina de nanorrelleno, Moquegua-2016. Revista Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2017; 3(5): 24-34. Disponible en: https://revistas.ujcm.edu.pe/index.php/rctd/article/view/75

Kinoshita Rivas HA, Acurio Benavente CM. Comparación in vitro de la resistencia adhesiva en dentina utilizando tres sistemas adhesivos universales [tesis de licenciatura en Internet]. Lima: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas; 2017. Disponible en: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/622866

Ulker M, Esra H, Karabekiroglu S, Selim M, Riza A. Effect of alternative modes of application on microleakage of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Sci [Internet]. 2013; 8(4): 425-431. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790212001596?via%3Dihub

Algailani U, Alshaikhli LO, Al-Zahawi A, Alzbeede A, Diyya ASM, Osman O. Comparing occlusal and cervical microleakage in class V restorations using two different nanohybrid resin composite with different insertion techniques. Mater Today Proc [Internet]. 2022; 60(3): 1736-1740. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214785321080457

Jinez Zúñiga PA, García Merino IR, Silva Silva JO. Microfiltración marginal en cavidades clase II restauradas con resina nano híbridas vs. resinas nanohíbridas bulk fill. Estudio in vitro. Odontología [Internet]. 2020; 22(1): 55-65. Disponible en: https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/2120

Shafiei F, Dehghani Z, Jowkar Z. The influence of the operator´s experience on the microleakage of two universal adhesives. Clin Exp Dent Res [Internet]. 2021; 7(6): 951-956. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.458

Ertürk AT, Bağlar S. Evaluation of microleakage in class V cavities prepared by different caries removal methods. Microsc Res Tech [Internet]. 2019; 82(9): 1566-1574. Disponible en: https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.23322

Bilgrami A, Alam MK, Qazi FU, Maqsood A, Basha S, Ahmed N, et al. An in-vitro evaluation of microleakage in resin-based restorative materials at different time intervals. Polymers [Internet]. 2022; 14(3): 466. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/3/466

Published

2023-12-12

How to Cite

1.
Cahuayme Chávez AR, Chávez Méndez M. Comparison of the degree of microleakage in three restorative systems using universal adhesives: an in vitro study. Rev Estomatol Herediana [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 12 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];33(4):311-9. Available from: https://revistas.upch.edu.pe/index.php/REH/article/view/5111

Issue

Section

ARTICLE