Pet owners' perceptions about the use of euthanasia in Lima, Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/stv.v11i2.5136Keywords:
euthanasia, pets, mental health, public healthAbstract
The objective of the study was to describe the criteria used by pet owners in Metropolitan Lima when they decide to resort to euthanasia. The study developed corresponded to an observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. It used surveys implemented in Google Forms format. The survey data were automatically stored in a Google Excel database and summarized using descriptive statistics. Of the 405 pet owners surveyed, the majority were female (75.1 %), between 26 and 50 years of age (55.1 %), and had a university education (78.8 %). Likewise, 99.8 % of participants had heard about euthanasia; 50.1 % had used this service for an animal they owned; 99.0 % considered that they decided to use this procedure for relevant and appropriate reasons. Ninety-six percent mentioned that they received advice from a veterinarian in order to make an informed decision; 50.7% stated that it is necessary to implement a unique environment for euthanasia; 96.1% thought that euthanasia was the best choice to alleviate the suffering of the pet and the family; and 78.3% mentioned that they were affected by the decision. Of the total number of respondents, 90.4% agreed with the practice of euthanasia in animals, and 95.3% indicated that the veterinarian should recommend euthanasia if considered necessary. From the results of the study, it is concluded that there is a need for the veterinarian in charge of euthanasia to handle open, respectful, and understandable communication skills, in addition to the need to receive training in psychological strategies to offer euthanasia services when required, as well as to handle in the best way the affliction caused by the decision taken by the owner, who should be assisted in those moments.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in Salud y Tecnología Veterinaria are under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 International license.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons License, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work, and to the first publication in this magazine.
Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version published in this journal, provided they clearly indicate that the work was published in this journal.
The authors can file in the repository of their institution:
The research work or thesis of degree from which the published article derives.
The pre-print version: the version prior to peer review.
The Post-print version: final version after peer review.
The definitive version or final version created by the publisher for publication.