Comparison of national and international sanitary standards regarding the proper use of antibiotics in species of aquaculture production applicable to the production of trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/stv.v10i2.4391Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the agreement between the provisions issued by the National Fisheries Health Agency (SANIPES) with its Chilean counterpart and the principles approved by the World Organization for Animal Health (OMSA), regarding the use of antimicrobial agents in aquaculture. To do this, the national regulations regarding the use of antibiotics in aquatic species were compared with the OMSA aquatic animal health code and two Chilean regulations, a country where aquaculture is more developed in the region. The norms were taken to comparison matrices and were later analyzed. It was found that the Peruvian regulations mostly implemented the guidelines indicated in the OMSA principles for the use of antibiotics in aquaculture aimed at distributors of antimicrobials for use in fish and producers of aquatic species. On the other hand, it did not specifically contemplate the guidelines for the use of antibiotics by aquaculture health professionals or guidelines on off-label use, in the comparison of the OMSA regulations and those of Chile. The qualitative evaluation found agreement between the SANIPES regulations and the OMSA principles aimed at distributors of antibiotic products for use in fish and producers of aquatic species, but low agreement between the guidelines aimed at veterinarians. In addition, the two Chilean regulations had a more specific structure and almost fully implemented the OMSA principles compared to the Peruvian one, for which reason an improvement in the latter is suggested according to the reality of the sector.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in Salud y Tecnología Veterinaria are under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 International license.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons License, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work, and to the first publication in this magazine.
Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version published in this journal, provided they clearly indicate that the work was published in this journal.
The authors can file in the repository of their institution:
The research work or thesis of degree from which the published article derives.
The pre-print version: the version prior to peer review.
The Post-print version: final version after peer review.
The definitive version or final version created by the publisher for publication.