Effect of different conditions and modes of  application on bond strength of adhesives to  dentine

Ticiane Cestari Fagundes; Rafael Simões Gonçalves; Fernanda De Souza e Silva Ramos; Laryssa De Castro Oliveira; Mariana Dias Moda; Mirela Sanae Shinohara

doi:10.20453/reh.v33i1.4430

Ticiane Cestari Fagundes Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva y Restauradora, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP). São Paulo, Brasil
Rafael Simões Gonçalves Departamento de Odontología, Endodoncia y Materiales Dentales, Facultad de Odontología de Bauru, Universidad de São Paulo. São Paulo, Brasil
Fernanda De Souza e Silva Ramos Departamento de Odontología Preventiva y Restauradora, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP). São Paulo, Brasil
Laryssa De Castro Oliveira Departamento de Odontología Preventiva y Restauradora, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP). São Paulo, Brasil
Mariana Dias Moda Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva y Restauradora, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP). São Paulo, Brasil
Mirela Sanae Shinohara Departamento de Odontologia Preventiva y Restauradora, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP). São Paulo, Brasil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20453/reh.v33i1.4430

Palabras clave: Dentina, Recubrimientos Dentinarios, Resistencia a la Tracción, Ultrasonido (DeCS)

Resumen

Objetivo: Evaluar la resistencia de la unión microtensil en diferentes condiciones de dentina (grabado-E, sin grabado-N, seco-D y húmedo-W) de un adhesivo multimodo (Scotchbond Universal-SU, 3M/ESPE) y un adhesivo de grabado total (Ambar-AB, FGM) utilizando un dispositivo sónico (Smart Sonic Device-SD, FGM). Material y Métodos: En este estudio in vitro, noventa y seis molares humanos extraídos sanos se dividieron en 12 grupos (n=8) de acuerdo con diferentes condiciones de dentina y sistemas adhesivos. Se eliminó el esmalte y se pulieron las superficies centrales de la dentina. Cada sistema adhesivo se aplicó de acuerdo con las diferentes condiciones de dentina, y los bloques de resina compuesta se acumularon de forma incremental y se almacenaron durante 24h. Las muestras se seccionaron en barras y los datos de resistencia de la unión se analizaron con la prueba de Kruskal-Wallis y la prueba de U de Mann-Whitney. Resultado: No se observaron efectos de la aplicación sónica. En general, AB mostró resultados más bajos en comparación con el SU. Las condiciones E y N no afectaron estadísticamente la fuerza de unión de los grupos SU. La dentina seca presentó valores de fuerza de adhesión estadísticamente superiores en comparación con la dentina húmeda para el grupo SU/E/SD. Conclusión: La adhesión de la dentina seca con un sistema adhesivo multimodo puede ser superior a la dentina húmeda con aplicación sónica. Los modos de aplicación no tuvieron influencia en la resistencia de la unión de los adhesivos estudiados.

Referencias

REFERENCIAS

Toledano M, Osorio R. New advanced materials for high performance at the resin-dentine interface. Front Oral Biol 2015; 17: 39-48.

Nawareg MM, Zidan AZ, Zhou J, Chiba A, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: A review. Am j Dent 2015; 28: 321-332.

Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ, Gallina G. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review. Curr Pharm Des 2012; 18: 5542-5552.

Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 481-495.

Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014; 29:295-308.

Dennison JB, Sarrett DC. Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39: 301-318.

Reis A, Dourado Loguercio A, Schroeder M, Luque-Martinez I, Masterson D, Cople Maia L. Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult patients with posterior resin composite restorations?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2015; 31:1052-67.

Elkaffas AA, Hamama HHH, Mahmoud SH. Do universal adhesives promote bonding to dentin? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor Dent Endod 2018; 43:29.

Stape THS, Seseogullari-Dirihan R, Tiäderhane L, Abuna G, Martins LRM, Tezverdil-Mutluay A. A novel dry-bonding approach to reduce collagen degradation and optimize resin-dentin interfaces. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 16890.

Ayar MK. A review of ethanol wet-bonding: principles and techniques. Eur J Dent 2016; 10: 155-159.

Cardoso MV, de Almeida Neves A, Mine A, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56: 31-44.

Bagis B, Turkaslan S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV . Effect of high frequency ultrasonic agitation on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009; 11: 369-374.

Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Cefaly DF, Carvalho CA, Navarro MF. Influence of ultrasonic setting on tensile bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 401-407.

Mena-Serrano A, Garcia EJ, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of sonic application mode on the resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified self-etch adhesive. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 729-736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1019-y

Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002; 30: 371-382.

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc 2003; 69: 726-731.

Kirsch J, Schimidt D, Herzberg D, WeberMT, Gäbler S, Hanning C. Effect of sonic aplication of self-etch adhesives on bonding fiber posts to root canal dentin. J Adhes Dent 2017; 19: 295-304.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 1176-1184.

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28.

Hipolito VD, Alonso RC, Carrilho MR, Anauate Netto C, Sinhoreti MA, Goes MF. Microtensile bond strength test and failure analysis to assess bonding characteristics of different adhesion approaches to ground versus unground enamel. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 122-128.

Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Effect of substrate age and adhesive composition on dentin bonding. Oper Dent 2013; 38: 267-274.

Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Torii Y, Osaka A et al. Self-etch monomer-calcium salt deposition on dentin. J Dent Res 2011; 90: 602-606.

Yazdi FM, Moosavi H, Atai M, Zeynali M. Dentin bond strength and degree of conversion evaluation of experimental self-etch adhesive systems. J Clin Exp Dent 2015; 7: 243-249.

Rosa WL, Piva E, Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015; 43: 765-776.

Taschner M, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Frankenberger R, Falconi M, Petschelt et al. Influence of preliminary etching on the stability of bonds created by one-step self-etch bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2012; 120: 239-248.

Dal-Bianco K, Pellizzaro A, Patzlaft R, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effects of moisture degree and rubbing action on the immediate resin-dentin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2006; 22: 1150-1156.

Reis A, Pellizzaro A, Dal-Bianco K, Gones OM, Patzlaff R, Loguercio AD. Impact of adhesive application to wet and dry dentin on long-term resin-dentin bond strengths. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 380-387.

Zander-Grande C, Ferreira SQ, da Costa TR, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Application of etch-and-rinse adhesives on dry and rewet dentin under rubbing action: a 24-month clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2011; 142: 828-835.

Loguercio AD, de Paula EA, Hass V, Luque-Martinez I, Reis A, Perdigao J. A new universal simplified adhesive: 36-Month randomized double-blind clinical trial. J Dent 2015; 43: 1083-1092.

Mena-Serrano A, Costa TR, Patzlaff RT, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of sonic application mode on the resin-dentin bond strength and dentin permeability of self-etching systems. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16: 435-440.

Finger WJ, Tani C. Effect of application mode on bonding performance of self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 41-44.

Loguercio AD, Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, Perdigao J. Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? J Dent 2015; 43:1060-1070.

Cuadros-Sanchez J, Szesz A, Hass V, Patzlaff RT, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of sonic application of adhesive systems on bonding fiber posts to root canals. J Endod 2014; 40: 1201-1205.

Soderhölm KJ, Geraldeli S, Shen C. What do microtensile bond strength values of adhesives mean? J Adhes Dent 2012; 14: 307-314.

Schmid-Schwap M, Graf A, Preinerstorfer A, Watts DC, Piehslinger E, Schedle A. Microleakage after thermocycling of cemented crowns--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 855-869.