Knowledge Transfer Strategy in a Regional University: The Case of UTN, Costa Rica 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/ah.v69iSupl.1.7756Keywords:
university, innovation, knowledge transfer, technologyAbstract
Abstract: This paper outlines the institutional knowledge transfer strategy of the National Technical University (UTN) of Costa Rica, a young public university with a clear regional and social mission. Developed by the Vice-Rectorate for Research and Knowledge Transfer, the strategy reflects a participatory process aimed at strengthening the university’s capacity to engage with external socio-productive sectors. Grounded in innovation systems theory and guided by open science principles, the strategy is built around five pillars, including governance, capacity building, external engagement, innovation culture, and evaluation. A 2025 institutional survey informed its design, revealing both existing strengths and key gaps—such as limited knowledge of intellectual property frameworks, weak incentive structures, and low levels of commercial transfer.
Downloads
References
Campos, A., Sáenz, S., & Carvajal, V. G. (2023). Atlas nacional de innovación 2022 [National Innovation Atlas 2022]. Consejo Nacional de Rectores. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12337/8569
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press.
Codner, D., Becerra, P., & Díaz, A. (2012). La transferencia tecnológica ciega: desafíos para la apropiación del conocimiento desde la universidad [Blind technology transfer: Challenges for the appropriation of knowledge from the university]. Redes, 18(35), 161–171. http://ridaa.unq.edu.ar/handle/20.500.11807/688
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.1.14273
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: practice and principles. Harper & Row.
Etzkowitz, H. (1996). A triple helix of academic–industry–government relations: Development models beyond “capitalism versus socialism.” Current Science, 70(8), 690–693. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24097580
Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557221
Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–307). National Academy Press.
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/25.3.195
Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., & Ensley, M. D. (2005). The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: Managerial and policy implications. Research Policy, 34(7), 981–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.010
López, M. S., Mejía, J. C., & Schmal, R. (2006). Un acercamiento al concepto de la transferencia de tecnología en las universidades y sus diferentes manifestaciones. Panorama Socioeconómico, 24(32), 70–81. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39903208
Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers.
Mustar, P., Wright, M., & Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X282862
OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). OECD Publishing.
Pisano, G. P. (2006). Science business: The promise, the reality, and the future of biotech. Harvard Business School Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sábato, J. A., & Botana, N. (1970). La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo de América Latina [Science and technology in the future development of Latin America]. Revista de la Integración, 1(2), 15–36.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1–2), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing Innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (5th ed.). Wiley.
Upstill, G., & Symington, D. (2002). Technology transfer and the creation of companies: the CSIRO experience. R&D Management, 32(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00256
Wright, M., Birley, S., & Mosey, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(3–4), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034121.02507.f3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eric Alvarado Barrantes , Silvia Sáenz León
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Acta Herediana are under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 International license.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons License, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work, and to the first publication in this magazine.
Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version published in this journal, provided they clearly indicate that the work was published in this journal.
The authors can file in the repository of their institution:
The research work or thesis of degree from which the published article derives.
The pre-print version: the version prior to peer review.
The Post-print version: final version after peer review.
The definitive version or final version created by the publisher for publication.
