Evidence, Dogma and Scientism: Reflections on the Scientific in the 21st Century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20453/ah.v68i1.6676Downloads
References
Ben-David, J. y Sullivan, T. A. (1975). Sociology of science. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.001223
Berger, P. y Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday.
Boudry, M. y Pigliucci, M. (ed.) (2017). Science Unlimited?: The Challenges of Scientism. University of Chicago Press.
Dogmas, paradigms and proving hypotheses (2010). Nature Immunology, 11, 455. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni0610-455
Durkheim, É. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Le système totémique en Australie. Quadrige.
Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1994). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. Vintage.
Hughes, A. L. (2012). The folly of scientism. The New Atlantis, (37), 32-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43152744
Ioannidis, J. P. (2009). Adverse events in randomized trials: neglected, restricted, distorted, and silenced. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(19), 1737-1739. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.313
Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.012
Ioannidis, J. P. (2017). Hijacked evidence-based medicine: stay the course and throw the pirates overboard. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 84, 11-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.001
Kuhn, T. (1963). The function of dogma in scientific research. En A. C. Crombie (ed), Scientific Change (pp. 347-369). Basic Books.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
McCarthy, E. D. (2016). Knowledge, Sociology of. En G. Ritzer (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosk012.pub2
Merton, R. K. (1937). The sociology of knowledge. Isis, 27(3), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1086/347276
Oviedo, D., Balletbó, I. y Vallejos, L. A. (2023). Qué es eso llamado epistemología, para qué sirve, por qué es inexcusable para la universidad y para la paz. Reencuentro. Análisis de problemas universitarios, 35(86), 295-320. https://reencuentro.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/reencuentro/article/view/1244
Popper, K. (1959 [1934]). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books.
Prigatano, G. P. (2003). Challenging dogma in neuropsychology and related disciplines. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(8), 811-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00205-6
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B. y Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
Sarrazin, J. P. y Cáceres, C. F. (2024). Disputes over the figures over the COVID-19 pandemic: epistemic diversity, dissemination of science, and political opposition. Sociology of Health & Illness, 47(1), e13833. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13833
Stenmark, M. (1997). What is scientism? Religious Studies, 33(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412596003666
Voegelin, E. (1948). The origins of scientism. Social Research, 15(4), 462-494.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Carlos F. Cáceres

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Acta Herediana are under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 International license.
The authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work registered with the Creative Commons License, which allows third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work, and to the first publication in this magazine.
Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version published in this journal, provided they clearly indicate that the work was published in this journal.
The authors can file in the repository of their institution:
The research work or thesis of degree from which the published article derives.
The pre-print version: the version prior to peer review.
The Post-print version: final version after peer review.
The definitive version or final version created by the publisher for publication.


