Evidencia, dogma y cientificismo: Reflexiones sobre lo científico en el siglo XXI

Autores/as

  • Carlos F. Cáceres Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20453/ah.v68i1.6676

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Carlos F. Cáceres , Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

    

Citas

Ben-David, J. y Sullivan, T. A. (1975). Sociology of science. Annual Review of Sociology, 1, 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.01.080175.001223

Berger, P. y Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Doubleday.

Boudry, M. y Pigliucci, M. (ed.) (2017). Science Unlimited?: The Challenges of Scientism. University of Chicago Press.

Dogmas, paradigms and proving hypotheses (2010). Nature Immunology, 11, 455. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni0610-455

Durkheim, É. (1912). Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse. Le système totémique en Australie. Quadrige.

Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. University of Chicago Press.

Foucault, M. (1994). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. Vintage.

Hughes, A. L. (2012). The folly of scientism. The New Atlantis, (37), 32-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43152744

Ioannidis, J. P. (2009). Adverse events in randomized trials: neglected, restricted, distorted, and silenced. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(19), 1737-1739. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.313

Ioannidis, J. P. (2016). Evidence-based medicine has been hijacked: a report to David Sackett. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.012

Ioannidis, J. P. (2017). Hijacked evidence-based medicine: stay the course and throw the pirates overboard. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 84, 11-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.001

Kuhn, T. (1963). The function of dogma in scientific research. En A. C. Crombie (ed), Scientific Change (pp. 347-369). Basic Books.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

McCarthy, E. D. (2016). Knowledge, Sociology of. En G. Ritzer (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosk012.pub2

Merton, R. K. (1937). The sociology of knowledge. Isis, 27(3), 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1086/347276

Oviedo, D., Balletbó, I. y Vallejos, L. A. (2023). Qué es eso llamado epistemología, para qué sirve, por qué es inexcusable para la universidad y para la paz. Reencuentro. Análisis de problemas universitarios, 35(86), 295-320. https://reencuentro.xoc.uam.mx/index.php/reencuentro/article/view/1244

Popper, K. (1959 [1934]). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books.

Prigatano, G. P. (2003). Challenging dogma in neuropsychology and related disciplines. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(8), 811-825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00205-6

Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B. y Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

Sarrazin, J. P. y Cáceres, C. F. (2024). Disputes over the figures over the COVID-19 pandemic: epistemic diversity, dissemination of science, and political opposition. Sociology of Health & Illness, 47(1), e13833. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13833

Stenmark, M. (1997). What is scientism? Religious Studies, 33(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412596003666

Voegelin, E. (1948). The origins of scientism. Social Research, 15(4), 462-494.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-06-30

Cómo citar

Cáceres , C. F. (2025). Evidencia, dogma y cientificismo: Reflexiones sobre lo científico en el siglo XXI . Acta Herediana, 68(1), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.20453/ah.v68i1.6676

Número

Sección

ÉTICA, HISTORIA Y FILOSOFÍA